Most founders know their product. Few know how to get it in front of the right people. In this hands-on session, Clay + HubSpot for Startups walk you through ICP definition, prospect list enrichment, and AI-personalized outreach. You launch your first sequence before the session ends. June 18. 11am ET / 4pm GMT.

Register Before June 18.

A guy who built and sold a software company for $20 million read our new landing page last week and could not tell me what we actually do.

That stung. I had spent weeks on that page. And he is exactly the person I wrote it for.

So I did the thing I tell every client to do. I stopped defending the page and started testing what was actually wrong with it.

Here is my week, in the format I use for everything: what won, what lost, and the one signal I did not see coming.

Three cuts beat what I had before. Every one of them came from removing a claim, not adding a word.

Cut the count before you trim the words.

A founder who sold a software company for $20 million read my page and could not say what we do, because I was selling three things at once. A cold reader spends the first beat just remembering who you are. A third promise shoves the first one out of memory before it ever lands, so two promises beat three every time.

Name the enemy, not the category.

My old headline described me. The word dashboard quietly filed my product next to every analytics tool the buyer already ignores. I cut the category noun and led with the enemy they are fighting plus the wasted spend I can show them: “See what Meta hides. Build the ad that wins.” Name the fight and the reader pictures themselves in it.

Give them one action, not a menu.

My page had drifted to a softer button that buried the real offer, and every extra choice splits intent. So I cut it back to a single obvious next step. The action I actually wanted became the only thing left to click, and the click rate is the proof that subtraction beat addition again.

Two things I was sure about turned out to be wrong.

I thought the trial signup should be the headline call to action. But a buyer who cannot tell what the product does will never start a trial. They have nothing to try yet.

I also thought three value props made me look complete. They made me look unfocused. Every prop I added past two divided the reader's attention instead of adding to it.

The surprise was where the best feedback came from.

It did not come from a survey or a focus group. It came from one sharp person reading the page cold and telling me, plainly, that he was confused. That one honest reaction was worth more to me than a month of internal debate.

That is the whole case for testing on strangers. The people closest to your offer are the worst judges of whether it is clear.

Clarity is subtraction.

If a smart buyer cannot repeat your offer back to you after 30 seconds, the fix is almost never more words. It is fewer claims, a named enemy, and one obvious next step. I did not write my way out of a confusing page. I cut my way out.

And the cut itself became the test. Every line I removed was a small bet about what the buyer actually needed. The page got shorter and the message got sharper at the same time.

That is the move I want you to steal this week.

The page I rebuilt is 1Signal. See it yourself: 1signal.io.

One tap. I will share where the votes land in a future issue.

Send me your landing page or your main offer. I will tell you, in plain language, the first thing I would cut and the first thing I would test.

If you want proof before opinion, I will run a 48-hour Meta Ads microtest on your offer this week. You give me the audience and the ask. I bring the variants, the ad spend setup, and a clear read on which message your market actually responds to.

Or just reply with your homepage URL. I will send back the one line I would test first.

Roman